Lower middle class house11/13/2023 ![]() In this session, we collect scholarly studies on the rehabilitation and re-use of public spaces in post-socialist cities and villages. After decades of severely controlled public life, inhabitants of the post-socialist cities have been suspicious towards using the public spaces and socialist public functions as their natural meeting places, but rehabilitation projects and new public functions gave life even to the most utopian and grandiose spaces, especially where community involvement was used for the redesign. New urbanization projects made possible the construction of new types of public spaces and public buildings, giving space to large controlled parades of the socialist society but less to small-scale community socialization. Public spaces in the socialist bloc acquired new political and social functions, therefore faced a drastic transformation compared with the traditional use of the marketplaces and promenades from before the world wars. Will high-quality, productive landscapes be born at these transitory places still looking for their new identity? Can the socialist industrial heritage be the base of resilient urban dynamics and new regenerative processes? The session focuses on the treatment of urban heritage and new strategies in these territories in post-socialist cities. Their transformation has taken many different paths in recent years, but their impact on urban life is almost unquestionable. Despite their excellent urban location, they relatively quickly lost their economic background and started a process usually associated with decay. Starting from the early 1990s, however, the political and economic changes in these countries began transforming these industrial urban landscapes. They created a new culture of industrialization and unique built environment identities of the urban fabric. ![]() How have new tourism trends transformed landscape identities? What rehabilitation challenges and tools are emerging in the renewal of tourist facilities? In what ways is it possible to define new concepts for post-socialist leisurescapes?Īs a result of the centralized industrialization plans of the socialist countries after the Second World War, completely new industrial landscapes came into being, sometimes without profound precedents. The new forms of freedom pose new challenges to post-socialist leisure escapes. Formerly modern tourist monuments today struggle with problems of heritage protection, rehabilitation, demolition, or transformation. But post-socialist resorts are now being shaped by privatization and contemporary tourism concepts. Simple and lightweight, experimental buildings soon became widely popular and deeply positioned in the collective memory as landmarks. However, the building process transformed the landscapes spectacularly, the buildings were designed just to meet the functional needs of seasonal tourism, focusing on a short period of land use. The increasing infrastructure capacity has opened up new DOCONF 2023 / / Department of Urban Planning and Design / BME Budapest opportunities for domestic tourism and recreation for a broader range of society, while it became a showcase for socialism for international tourism. While in the West, freedom emerged in the form of the right to leisure, in the East, holidays became a means of consolidating social policy. Post-Socialist Transformation Challenges on Seasonal Landscapes: Freedom appeared on a new scale but with a different meaning in eastern and western landscapes after the Second World War. Nevertheless, mass housing neighbourhoods represent highly specific areas of cities demanding conceptual and thoughtful public policy decisions regarding their complex sustainability and livability.Faced with their actual status, the housing needs, aspirations of the inhabitants, or the climate issues and the pandemic situation, what are the possible changes in this urban heritage? How do we not betray the social and egalitarian ideals which motivate the construction of these neighbourhoods? And what challenges lie ahead for the inherited mass housing neighbourhoods of the post-socialist cities? In post-socialist cities, most of the housing estates were publicly owned, centrally planned, built, and managed developments, but after the privatization process, their conditions changed, and they have a lower ability to integrate current housing requirements. Modern and contemporary theories and practices shaping these housing developments seem to be global, but the urban form, architectural characteristics, technical details, ownership system, space division, everyday life, etc., are varied locally. Throughout the world, mass housing was the answer to access decent living conditions after the Second World War and is still a used answer to the housing shortage in many countries.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |